search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Results


Dew Quantification Turfgrass species and time after sunrise affected the dew volume collected. More dew was held in the bermudagrass canopy at 0, 15, 45, 60, 75, and 90 MAS (Table 2) than was simultaneously observed in zoysiagrass. Te maximum dew volume retained in the bermudagrass canopy was 125 gal A-1


retained in the zoysiagrass canopy was 80 gal A-1


at 0 MAS, while the maximum dew volume MAS.


Tis report of ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass dew retention is higher than 50.4 gal A-1


collected between 6 and 7:30


am reported by McCurdy et al. (2017). Te results indicate that bermudagrass retains greater quantities of dew longer than zoysiagrass. Optimal timing for future remote sensing missions will be within 90 minutes of sunrise, based on the dew retention and duration patterns discussed here, but detection may vary due to sunlight, sun angle, and cloud cover.


Table 2. Average volume of dew collected from 1 square foot (0.0929 square meter) frame of ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass and ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass maintained at 1.25 inches (3.175 centimeters) on 15, 18, 23, 24 August 2024 in Starkville, MS.


Minutes after sunrise


Dew Volume (gal A-1


)


Bermud a


0


15 30 45 60 75 90


105 120 135 150 165 180


125 99


106 118 123 83 55 39 25 11 6 1 1


Zoysia


39 46 80 23 53 52 8


20 15 1 3 1 2


*** **


Ns *** *** *


**


Ns Ns Ns Ns Ns Ns


*** indicates P ≤ 0.001, ** indicates P ≤ 0.01, * indicates P ≤ 0.05, ns indicates P ≥0.05


Remote Sensing Areas identified as bermudagrass and zoysiagrass by the Magic tool of R1 and R2 flights were in visual agreement with human annotations of bermudagrass and zoysiagrass in the area (Figures 1, 2). From the D1 flight, most areas of human-annotated bermudagrass contamination were detected and selected by the Magic tool, although some weak zoysiagrass areas were incorrectly detected as bermudagrass (Figure 3). Te Magic tool failed to detect some bermudagrass contamination and mislabeled zoysiagrass as bermudagrass in the D2 flight (Figure 4).


28 TPI Turf News September/October 2025


Figure 2. (a) Orthomosaic of adjacent stands of ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass and ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass on August 18, 2024 (R2). (b) Highlighted portion is the manual annotation of zoysiagrass and nonhighlighted area is hybrid bermudagrass. (c) Highlighted portion is zoysiagrass identified by the PIX4Dfields Magic selection tool following selection of cells representative of hybrid bermudagrass and zoysiagrass.


Pairwise Significanc e


A significant quantity of grass clippings, to the extent actively growing turfgrass could not be seen from above, was present on the field during the D2 flight, which had a lighter appearance than actively growing bermudagrass and zoysiagrass. Te Magic tool could not delineate bermudagrass contamination from zoysiagrass in orthomosaics from M1 and M2 (Figure 5). Te fields from M1 and M2 had areas of active harvesting and weak regrowth after harvest that did not have 100 percent ground cover, causing some zoysiagrass to have a lighter appearance than the ready-to-harvest sod.


Figure 1. (a) Orthomosaic of adjacent stands of ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass and ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass on June 12, 2024 (R1). (b) Highlighted portion is the manual annotation of zoysiagrass and nonhighlighted area is bermudagrass. (c) Highlighted portion is zoysiagrass identified by the PIX4Dfields Magic selection tool following selection of cells representative of bermudagrass and zoysiagrass.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84