standardized unmanned control mea- sures, clear precision strike release auth- orities at echelon, and established tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) for cueing fires based on EMS intelligence. Without this common language, we risk confusion and fratricide at speed.
In Leader Development, we must build the “headware” for this new environment. Leaders at the company and battalion level need practical literacy in EMS and C-UAS, kill-web management, and com- plex airspace control. This reflects the modernization enterprise’s emphasis on delivering capabilities at speed and scale – a principle that must apply not just to equipment, but to the knowledge our leaders need to employ it. We need a repeatable “innovation-to-scale” pipeline that allows the best ideas from our small units to be rapidly shared, tested, valida- ted Army-wide.
Challenges and Risks in Transformation-in-Contact This transformation is not without signi- ficant challenges and risks that demand our full attention. Operationally, the dens- ity of airspace and EMS activity at speed elevates the risk of fratricide and signa- ture exposure. We must also guard against an overreliance on automation without clear human-judgment rules, as mandat- ed by DoD Directive 3000.09, Autonomy in Weapon Systems.1 Sustainment at tempo – resupplying precision effects, power, and maintenance – will remain a pacing item. We must also assume our adversaries will adapt with jamming, deception, and C-UAS/EW capabilities.
Institutionally, we face the danger of learning the wrong lessons, succumbing to resistance to change, and managing increased costs. Perhaps the greatest risk is lacking a unifying framework, which can lead to a deviation from the Armor Force Fundamentals as we chase niche capabilities.
A Guiding Framework: Isolation– Exploitation–Regeneration To mitigate these risks and align the branch, the IER framework provides a clear structure for planning and execution.
Isolation: Replace traditional mass-on- mass confrontation with persistent un- manned “see-sense-strike” complexes. Using AI-powered machine learning and
48
precision fires, attrit and suppress enemy defenses at critical nodes, forcing them to fight disconnected battles.
Exploitation: Preserve sufficient mounted combat power to rapidly capitalize on the tactical successes created during isola- tion. Use tank and mechanized infantry assets as an exploitation force to move through gaps created by unmanned sys- tems, protected by robust C-UAS capa- bilities to maximize shock effect.
Regeneration: Recommit unmanned sys- tems to reestablish the FLOS and transi-
tion to the next objective. Leverage the reduced logistics footprint of unmanned systems for faster resupply and reposi- tioning, enabling a sustainable and pun- ishing operational tempo.
This framework provides a common lexi- con to plan, execute, and assess oper- ations. It helps prioritize our training and procurement efforts and ensures that technology serves our operational con- cepts, not the other way around.
TiC positions the ABCT as the Army’s premier formation for generating over-
Figure 3. Illustrates the ‘Regeneration Phase’ of the IER framework. CAVALRY & ARMOR JOURNAL Spring 2026
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52
