search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Te overarching theme of this trip was for representatives from our industry to meet and communicate face-to-face with agencies and legislators so that they understand our industry, its challenges, and the many benefits of turfgrass seed and sod.


As many of you know, seed and sod are often considered specialty crops by various agencies and the uniqueness of it sometimes doesn’t quite fit with more traditional agricultural programs or the various regulatory agencies that impact agricultural policy.


As a result, we split the trip into two separate sessions. Te first of these two sessions was agency visits, where we met with upper administration at the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), USDA Risk Management Agency (RMA), USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA), and Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Office of Pesticide Programs. Te second of the two sessions were legislative visits, where we met with members and staffers from the U.S. House and Senate, and with legislative affairs staff at the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) headquarters.


Agency Visits


Our agency visits began at the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) headquarters where we met with USDA staff to discuss the sod checkoff program, crop insurance, research programs, market reports, BioPreferred programs, and more. We also discussed pending and proposed legislation that may impact some or all these programs and potentially our industry.


Tey were excited to meet with our producers, hear about our industry first-hand, and better understand how we can work with them to improve existing programs or to create new ones. A great example of this is crop insurance. Our industry has historically had an extremely low rate of subscribing to USDA crop insurance programs such as Whole Farm Revenue Protection (WFRP) and Non- Insured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP). Why? Our producers tell us that some of the terms of these programs don’t fit our niche industry. USDA understands this and told us during our visit that they would be happy to work with us to try to create new programs or modify existing programs to better serve our industry.


How many products do you think are managed each year at the EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs (EPA-OPP) to ensure that they work safely and effectively? A hundred? A thousand? During our visit at EPA headquarters, the Director of EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs told us they manage over 80,000 products, 1,100 active ingredients, have received 20 registrations for new active ingredients this year alone, and that it takes about two to three years to approve each of them. Wow.


One of my roles at TPI is to track these pesticide registration reviews so that seed and sod producers can provide input from our industry’s perspective. We’ve done this with success in recent years on products such as oxadiazon, mesotrione, mancozeb, MSMA, and others.


TPI Future Leaders at USDA Headquarters. Pictured from left to right are Ryan Menken, Dr. Casey Reynolds, Mark Graf, Ben Boehme, Sarah Nolte, Matt Duncan, Kelsey Sandbothe, and Kevin Morris, president of the National Turfgrass Foundation (NTF) and executive director of the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP).


TPI Turf News November/December 2023 117


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148