search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Tackling Suboptimization Head-On


Ultimately, the goal of forming strategic partnerships is to fully optimize end- to-end supply chains. Autry’s work with the FDC includes identifying how dealers and suppliers can achieve this optimization by streamlining the flow of raw materials, products, logistics, and data across the supply chain. As Autry points out, trust and collaboration are fundamental to establishing this kind of structure.


“Supply chain optimization essentially requires strategic partnerships, where companies collaborate on shared goals like cost reduction, resilience and customer service,” Autry says. “But no one wants to invest in the infrastructure for these to succeed unless they truly believe there is a long-term future with the partners such that economic gains can be fully realized.” The FDC’s exploration into


optimizing the distribution supply chain comes at just the right time, as the prospect of higher tariffs has primed companies to rethink their approach. This creates opportunities for dealers and suppliers to identify and remove inefficiencies and improve their supply chain practices. However, part of


“One way we see [suboptimization] occur far too often is when companies chase short-term financial metrics to an unhealthy degree. In doing so, they create systems that become a ‘new normal’ that can harm other financial or operational metrics in the longer term.”


— Chad Autry


Myers Distinguished Professor of Supply Chain Management University of Tennessee, Knoxville


the FDC’s work will be to examine how the transactional relationships discussed earlier are creating barriers to these improvements, leading to “suboptimization” in the supply chain. For example, transactional thinking may prompt a company to cut inventory expenses in the short term but cause costly stockouts downstream, impacting partners.


“One way we see this occur far too often is when companies chase short- term financial metrics to an unhealthy degree,” Autry explains. “In doing so, they create systems that become a ‘new normal’ that can harm other financial or operational metrics in the longer term.” For a real-world example of how suboptimization can weaken a business,


consider a company whose sourcing team made a compelling economic case for installing “green” lighting systems in its warehouse. Although the lower energy usage of those green systems would yield substantial financial savings after a 20-month breakeven point, achieving that benefit required a significant, upfront cash outlay. “Because the executives didn’t want financials to suffer in the near term — after all, their compensation was tied directly to hitting certain numbers quarterly — they decided to forego the opportunity to create long-term, permanent savings,” Autry recounts. “Everyone agreed that the green lighting systems were a cost-effective idea, but the company’s leaders didn’t


Spring 2025 13


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64