This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
D


ue to the locaon, design, or perhaps other reasons, many neighboring community associaons share maintenance obligaons for certain common elements and facilies that benet both communies. These shared


maintenance items may include roadways and sidewalks, club houses, recreaonal facilies, natural features such as lakes and ponds, as well as retenon basins, and drainage swales that service both communies. Since most maintenance sharing relaonships will last for the duraon of the communies and involve considerable nancial commitments, proper planning and documentaon are crical.


Since shared maintenance agreements are oen put in place by developers well before the unit owners take control of their associaons, many such agreements are wrien from the perspecve of the developer as opposed to the unit owners. A common example is when Developer A purchases mulple tracts of adjoining land and builds a community on only one or two of these tracts. Thereaer, Developer A seeks to sell the remaining tracts to Developer B. However, since the remaining tracts are landlocked, Developer B will only agree to purchase this real estate if it can secure access rights over the roadways and sidewalks of the community built by Developer A. Given the addional wear and tear that this would have upon the roadways in Developer A’s community, Developer B enters into a shared maintenance agreement. Before a unit is even sold, Developer B has already commied its community to sharing in the costs of maintaining certain roadways and sidewalks in Developer A’s community.


Somemes a developer must seek access rights from a neighboring community that is controlled by the unit owners. In these situaons, the shared maintenance agreements tend to be far more favorable to the community that is already established. Unlike shared maintenance agreements entered into between developers, there are no sale proceeds to be enjoyed by the community. Accordingly, most communies will try to extract greater concessions from the developer with respect to the shared maintenance obligaons. Not only do communies have greater bargaining power in these situaons, but also the developers’ primary concern is the ability to build and sell units. Accordingly, developers will oen agree to lopsided shared


maintenance agreements in these situaons.


The purpose of the examples listed above is to demonstrate why the perceived fairness of shared maintenance agreements can vary greatly between community associaons. The circumstances surrounding the creaon of a shared maintenance agreement will dictate its terms. Perceived inequies among neighboring communies with regard to their shared maintenance obligaons will oen arise many years aer the shared maintenance agreements have been negoated and the circumstances surrounding the agreement have long since been forgoen.


Although not as common, shared maintenance agreements do arise between community associaons in which the developers have long since le. Regardless of the circumstances, shared maintenance agreements are not to be entered into lightly. Again, it is important to remember that these agreements are longterm and will likely be in place for the duraon of the communies’ existence. Therefore, the importance of proper documentaon cannot be understated.


The individual circumstances along with the governing documents of each community will dictate the terms and condions of each shared maintenance agreement. Nevertheless, there are fundamental provisions and concepts that should be addressed in any shared maintenance agreements. The remainder of this arcle will address some of the more essenal provisions.


CONSULT THE GOVERNING DOCUMENTS OF THE ASSOCIATION Before an associaon can even contemplate a shared maintenance arrangement, its execuve board must consult the associaon’s governing documents to determine whether this type of arrangement is even permied. Depending upon what is contained in the governing documents, an amendment to the declaraon or the bylaws may be the necessary rst step towards structuring a shared maintenance agreement.


A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO THE AGREEMENT Since shared maintenance agreements will oen last for the duraon of the parcipang communies, it is a good idea to include a brief descripon of the circumstances surrounding their creaon. This is especially important for shared maintenance agreements that may seem to favor one community over


18 |


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40