search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
GROUNDWATER MODELING & VISUALIZATION


that are not laterally contiguous and/or gradational. This modeling was constrained above by the ground surface model. The lower portion of the lithologic model was con- strained below by the uppermost unit within the stratig- raphy model.


5. Merging the Lithology and Stratigraphy Models: The overburden lithology model was then combined with the stratigraphy model to produce a geology model (Fig- ure 4D).


6. Fracturing the Geology Model: Downhole fractures (Figure 4D) were then added to the geology model using a distance-to-fracture algorithm. This is accomplished          relative to the disc midpoints and setting the intersected         - 


the limestone because fractures were not observed within the underlying units. Fractures within the epikarst and dolomite were also modeled separately because nearby outcrops indicated that the fracture fabrics within the dolomite and limestone are quite different.


7. Converting the Fractured Geology Model to a Hy- draulic Conductivity (K) Model: The fractured geol- ogy model (Figure 4D) was then converted to a hydraulic conductivity model (Figure 4E) based on an equivalence table of rock conductivities provided by the client.


8. Creating an MHWL Model: A MHWL elevation model - metric surface elevations from the borehole database and approximating the elevations into a grid model using a Kriging algorithm in conjunction with a trend-polynomi- 


Figure 4. Models used to create time series groundwater contamination migration models (A-G) and sample output (H). 10 TPG • Oct.Nov.Dec 2022 www.aipg.org


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56