Do you feel standardized reports help your residents? If so, how? SG: Since the standardized reports are vetted for coding and billing, residents won’t have to do dictate addenda because they forgot a billable element.


MK: Our residents love using the standardized reports since they provide the necessary structure of reports and are efficient to use. It also helps to have the billable elements built into the reports because this helps the residents learn what needs to be in the reports.


With the standardized reports, the information is all there. It is far faster to correct reports, and far fewer changes are needed.


RS: I used to prefer narrative reports, but I would spend a long time correcting resident reports because they were unclear and often excluded important information. With the standardized reports, the information is all there. It is far faster to correct reports, and far fewer changes are needed. I cannot tell you how many residents have said how useful the reports are. They don’t need to guess what needs to go in the reports; they can dictate faster, capture all the key information, and the structure helps them understand the flow of the procedures. Because their dictations are completed right after the procedure, I’m able to sign off the reports on the same day rather than 1–2 days after the procedure.


What challenges did you experience when you started to use the reports? How did you convince others in your practice to use them? MK: Commit to using the reports on a few commonly performed procedures for a couple of weeks before making any judgments about them. Although they look cumbersome to use, they


18 IRQ | FALL 2022


are very quick and easy once you get used to them, particularly after you customize them.


MJ: I had to overcome the belief that I express things better than others, and that the nuances of my procedures required my artful exposition. That was clearly wrong. Standardized reports allow me to express the essentials of the procedures concisely and in a standardized manner. That’s what the people who read the reports want to read.


RS: The first version of the reports were long, tedious and not well received. But there was a lot of promise there that made us stick with it. The version 2.0 reports represented a huge improvement and made dictating faster, and versions 3.0 and 3.1 are even greater improvements. I never required anyone to use them. They just started using them on their own. No one has looked back since.


How have you customized your standardized report templates? SG: I have customized my reports to basic inputs such as my name and regularly used material such as the different chest ports or G-tubes we place.


MK: We’ve moved some report elements around. For example, we’ve moved the impression to the bottom of our reports so they display properly when our EMR reformats the reports. Additionally, we are working to get the radiation and contrast dose to automatically import into the reports. It is important to realize that you can add as much narrative text as you want at the institutional or individual provider level and, of course, to any specific patient report.


RS: I’ve added narrative text in certain places, moved modules around or deleted them and defaulted fields. These reports provide flexibility while also allowing us to use the same terminology as IRs across the country, so it’s easy to understand someone else’s procedure.


What recommendations would you have for other IRs considering standardized reporting in their practice? SG: For the future of our specialty, we all must adopt these standardized reports and join the VIRTEX data


If you have any hesitation, just try it for a month. I have met very few people who went back to narrative reports. Nearly everyone I have met who has been critical of them has never even tried using them.


registry. If everyone understood what’s at stake here and why SIR is making this such a high priority, I think they would gladly do it.


MK: Take a few minutes to review the user guide before using the standardized reports so you understand how customizable they are.


MJ: Try them. They are certainly going to be used by the majority of IRs within the next few years, and they provide innumerable benefits.


RS: If you have any hesitation, just try it for a month. I have met very few people who went back to narrative reports. Nearly everyone I have met who has been critical of them has never even tried using them. We are IRs—we live on the cutting edge of medicine. These reports are cutting edge and can give us a leg up in quality, reimbursement and research. We really need everyone to be using these.


Standardized reports are the future of IR medicine, and we


need everyone to take part. Adopt standardized reporting in your practice and join our VIRTEX registry today at sirweb.org/virtex.


For more information on standardized reporting, visit


bit.ly/3Lh9nYB.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48