serves a mix of constituents means that the price will likely be a little bit lower than if the sale were to a third-party buyer,” says Brownell. Some family businesses try to resolve such conflicts by inviting both sides to weigh in. “Many buy- sell agreements have provisions that call for both seller and buyer to get appraisals,” says Travis W. Harms, the leader of Mercer Capital’s Family Business Advisory Services Group (
mercercapital.com). “Te idea is that if the two results differ within a specified percentage, then everyone agrees to accept an average of the two.”
Unfortunately, what seems on the surface like a good solution too often turns out to be yet another source of conflict. An appraiser will usually shade the business value assessment to reflect the interests of whoever is footing the bill. “Once the parties are locked into a conflict, it is rare that the conclusions of the respective appraisers will be very close,” says Harms. “Te upshot is that the business ends up hiring a third appraiser. Not only does this take time and money, but there is still plenty of room for argument. Inevitably, one or both parties will be unsatisfied and that can lead to hard feelings and litigation.”
It’s tempting to try to head off the above conflicts by designing a valuation formula agreeable to everyone, then setting it in stone for use later. Tis also carries risks. “While a clearly defined formula can avoid the problem of ambiguity, the problem is that industries, markets and business operations change over time,” says Harms, “A formula that makes sense today may not make sense five or 10 years down the road when the buy-sell agreement has to be used.”
Regular Appraisals
Te secret to success, say consultants, is to schedule periodic appraisals with parameters that are clear and acceptable to all family members. “All parties should understand the approaches to the value being used and the assumptions being made,” says Harms. “Tat will reduce uncertainty and cut down on the potential for conflict later when a trigger event occurs.”
How often should the appraisals be done? For the best results, consultants say, the appraisal should be done annually. “It’s a lot less expensive to do that than to deal with the costly infighting that can otherwise result,” says Z. Christopher Mercer, CEO of Mercer Capital, Memphis (
mercercapital.com).
Periodic appraisals offer an important fringe benefit: knowledge about a business’s confirmed value that can help manage the family wealth. “Valuations can help family members understand the rate of return they're receiving on their investment in their private company,” says Mercer. “And just like any other investment, that rate is based upon three points: a beginning value, an ending value, and the interim distributions.”
120
Mercer offers an example: If a company stock valued at a hundred dollars one-year increases to $112 a year later, then the shareholders have enjoyed a 12 percent return on their investment. If the company has also paid them a $3 distribution, then their total return on investment has come to 15 percent.
Funding the Stock
Assessing the value of a family business is one thing. Scraping together sufficient cash to purchase a departing owner’s stock is another. Buy-sell agreements should address funding sources to obviate a lot of scrambling around when disaster strikes.
Insurance policies can provide funds for the purchase of shares in the event of death or disability. “Very often key person insurance can be taken out for individuals whose contribution to the business is so vital that if something were to happen to them, the operational and earnings capacity of the business would be unduly impacted,” says Brownell. “Te policy can be structured to pay sufficient cash to either hire a replacement, offset lost income, or purchase the insured’s stake in the business.”
Neither life nor disability insurance will help, though, for trigger events such as retirement, resignation, termination, or divorce. In such cases, businesses can find themselves searching for alternative funding sources. Perhaps the first solution that comes to mind is an outside lender. But in many cases, that’s less than ideal. “A business that borrows money may end up reducing its future capital expenditures or cutting back on mergers and acquisitions,” says Harms. “Tose alternatives can have adverse consequences for the company down the road.”
Purchase of shares by a third party also has its downsides. “Many family businesses are wary of bringing in non-family shareholders,” says Harms. “Anyone who invests money will want to exert their influence to make the company run the way they would like to see it run. Tat can create a whole host of unintended and potentially negative outcomes.”
Yet another solution is seller financing: Te company gives the outgoing owner a promissory note for a specified amount to be paid off with interest over a certain number of years. “Such an arrangement can help both parties,” notes Brownell. “Te business benefits from a cash flow perspective and the seller avoids receiving one huge check subject to taxation in the year received.” Te downside here is mostly borne by the seller, whose default risk may not be adequately compensated for by the interest received.
Finally, the family businesses may decide to retain the outgoing owners as third-party consultants for a given number of years. Tis can free the business from the need to secure a large amount of cash while providing regular
TPI Turf News November/December 2022
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140
