or 120-150 days for warm-season grasses. Tese ‘drought seasons’ under the shelters are part of Approach 1, which is a measurement of the amount of water needed to maintain a prescribed level of green during that period. Ten trial locations in the drier western U.S.
states (five each for cool-season and warm-season grasses) manage under Approach 2, which utilizes three evapotranspiration replacement rates (ETo
). In Approach
2 locations, researchers replace either 40, 60 or 80 percent of ETo
(as determined by local weather station data) for cool-season grasses, or 30, 45, or 60 percent ETo for warm-
season grasses. Tis scenario is more typical of irrigation patterns in the western U.S. with 25 inches or less of annual rainfall. Approach 2 data indicates the reduced irrigation level each entry will survive, and at what level each entry will deliver acceptable turfgrass quality. Terefore, the two approaches address the needs
across the U.S., from the humid, eastern U.S. with 30 plus inches of annual rainfall but with occasional prolonged drought periods, to the arid western U.S. where annual summer drought periods are expected. Te warm-season version of this trial was
established at ten locations in summer 2018. Te cool- season version of this trial was established in fall 2016 or spring 2017 at ten total sites, five under rain exclusion shelters in the eastern U.S. (Approach 1) and five in western U.S. field sites (Approach 2). Te cool-season version includes fifteen Kentucky bluegrasses, nineteen tall fescues and one perennial ryegrass (as a control entry). Te first data from the cool-season trial was
collected in 2017 at six of the ten locations. Four Approach 1 (shelter) locations collected data during a 100-day induced drought period, and in some cases, large differences were noted in the amount of water used by entries, however very small statistical differences were noted among entries. For 2018, we changed the re- watering procedure threshold to 65 percent green cover, as well as expanded our statistical analysis for all sites to include separate Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue tables. In 2018, all Approach 1 locations noted large differences in water needed to maintain 65 percent green cover. Four locations that were unable to collect three
years of data by 2019, concluded their data collection in 2020. Te Fayetteville, AR site’s (Approach 1) seasonal water needed ranged from 34.0 mm to 80.7 mm in 2020. No statistical differences were noted among water needed when comparing all Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue entries. However, there was some statistical significance among tall fescues when compared only to other tall fescue entries. Nonet (38 mm), MRSL TF15 (47 mm), BarRobusto (51 mm), Stetson II (51 mm), and Titanium 2 LS (51 mm) used the least water of the tall fescue group. Various factors resulted in limited data collection
in 2019 at the Amherst, MA, site (Approach 1), therefore they collected 2020 data using two distinct dry-down ‘seasons.’ Te first dry-down season of 2020 showed
40
excellent entry differences under the rainout shelter with NAI-13-14 and PST-K11-118 Kentucky bluegrass requiring the least water to maintain green cover (8.7 mm). Other bluegrasses such as Everest, Babe, Midnight, and NAI-13-132 also finished in the top statistical group, surprisingly ahead of every tall fescue entry. Te second dry-down season delivered very similar water use numbers, but with much less statistical significance. NAI-13-14, PST-K11-118, Babe, and Everest needed the least water again in ‘Season 2’ but with several tall fescues performing equally well. Two sites, Logan, UT, and Fort Collins, CO,
collected 2020 data under the Approach 2 regime. In 2018 and 2019, no Kentucky bluegrass season average reached the acceptable lawn quality level at any ETo
level
in Logan, with many falling below even the minimally acceptable quality score for low maintenance (5.0). Tis trend continued in 2020, except a few bluegrass entries did finish with turf quality averages of at least 5.0. Under the 40 percent ETo
above 5.0, also with PST-K13-141 and PST-K11-118 (6.0). At 80 percent ETo
PST-K13-137 finished at 5.0 or 5.1 in turf quality. Under the 60 percent ETo
regime, Dauntless, NAI-13-14, and level, those same entries were at or , only PST-K13-141, Dauntless,
and NAI-13-14 finished above 5.0. Tall fescues again performed better overall than
Kentucky bluegrass at Logan as several entries maintained lawn turfgrass acceptable quality (6.0+) under 40 percent ETo
. Tall fescue entries Kingdom, Tor, and PST-5SDS finished with the highest turfgrass quality under the 40 percent ETo
replacement with season average turfgrass
quality scores of 6.6, 6.5, and 6.4, respectively. Also noteworthy is that the turf quality scores of those three tall fescue entries did not fall below acceptable (6.0) for any of the last eight weeks of the drought ‘season.’ Te story with the 2020 Fort Collins, CO, data
was 1) statistical significance was very small, and 2) no entries delivered acceptable turfgrass quality scores
(6.0 or above), even under the optimum 80 percent ETo replacement level. All entries struggled under 40 percent ETo
PST-5SDS had the highest average turf quality at 4.3. Te 60 percent ETo
replacement as tall fescues DLFPS 321/3677 and level did deliver one tall fescue entry
(Tunderstruck) with a minimally acceptable average score of 5.0. Several tall fescues, but no Kentucky bluegrasses finished with a minimally acceptable average quality under 80 percent ET0
replacement. Te best tall fescues under
this level were PST-5SDS (5.5), DLFPS 321/3679 (5.4), Kingdom (5.4), and Tor (5.4).
Other Species Other cool-season species, such as prairie junegrass
(Koeleria spp.), tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia cespitosa), rough bluegrass (Poa trivialis), supina bluegrass (Poa supina), and annual bluegrass (Poa annua) are potential sod products, although limited in their utility and geographical
TPI Turf News July/August 2021
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84
