ABA Perspective Beating Back a Bad Idea:How Bankers
There’s a saying that “everything old is new again,” and that’s certainly an adage you can bank on in Washington, D.C., — especially when it comes to poor public policy proposals.
Rob Nichols, President and CEO American Bankers Association
A textbook example of this unfolded during the 117th Congress when our industry found itself once again facing a bad idea that we thought had been soundly defeated: placing restrictive routing mandates on credit cards, like those imposed on debit cards by the Durbin Amendment over a decade ago. Te idea came in the form of a bipartisan bill — the so-called Credit Card Competition Act — introduced in the Senate by Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Roger Marshall, R-Kan., and in the House by Reps. Peter Welch, D-Vt., and Lance Gooden, R-Texas.
Bankers know all too well that the 2010 Durbin Amendment had disastrous
consequences for banks and their customers: it increased the costs of checking accounts and debit cards and ultimately led to the elimination of popular debit card rewards programs. Te Durbin Amendment’s most damaging provisions apply to banks of all sizes, causing a nearly 25% cut in the per-transaction debit card revenue earned by banks with under $10 billion in assets. At the same time, it helped line the pockets of large retailers that talked a big game about passing savings on to consumers — but 10 years’ worth of data tells us that simply isn’t what happened. In fact, the Federal Reserve published a study finding that only 1% of merchants lowered prices for consumers since the Durbin price controls took effect.
What’s more, the Credit Card Competition Act also goes several steps further than the Durbin amendment — not only
would it require banks to add a second network to their customers’ cards, but it would limit them to options set by the Fed, unlike the Durbin Amendment, which allowed banks to choose between any two unaffiliated networks. Te Credit Card Competition Act also requires banks to accept virtually any kind of transaction — functionally requiring them to onboard potentially many more than two networks, even networks that don’t meet basic data security standards.
Given the potentially catastrophic effect the bill could have on community banks and bank customers — while providing no tangible cost savings or benefits for consumers — the industry sprang into action to set the record straight.
Immediately following the bill’s introduction, ABA led a coalition of eight national financial services trade
6
mobankers.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32
