search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Applied ethics By Kevin W. Dickey, MD, FSIR, FACR and Rayan Abboud, MS Combatting tribalism


How COVID-19 has defined the perception and practice of IR clinicians


T


he COVID-19 pandemic has provided many opportunities for medical professionals to share ideas on how to cope


with various aspects of patient care during this crisis. However, in the case of IR as a specialty, I think that we have seen a special phenomenon regarding how we as IR clinicians are involved and valued in our respective institutions. There is nothing like a crisis to expose who and what is most important. The pandemic has highlighted the importance of IRs as respected members of the health care team, which has had a positive impact on mitigating tribalism between IR and other specialties.


The ethical paradigm of tribalism describes an “us vs. them” mentality in which members feel loyalty to a socially constructed group, or tribe, and can result in contempt toward parties outside this group. Tribalism is a naturally occurring phenomenon in communities and has been a recent point of discussion in regard to specialties in medicine. It can be observed between different types of providers (e.g., physicians, nurses and advanced practice providers), between specialties, and even within specialties between residents and attendings. In some scenarios, tribalism can fuel healthy competition, but in the negative sense it can breed conflict, bitterness and isolation between groups. This pandemic brings to question how IRs are classically valued in a medical society that often exhibits dysfunctional and counterproductive competition. The concept of tribalism also extends to the exclusion of IRs from teamwork within true multidisciplinary patient care.


38 IRQ | SUMMER 2020


Hopefully, IR response during this pandemic will result in other medical specialties understanding just how much IRs can be the conduit to true multidisciplinary care and how we should be respected as colleagues and clinicians.


Due to COVID-19, IRs have increased opportunities to directly interact with practitioners of other specialties. Some of these opportunities have been accomplished by expanding systems to perform selected procedures at the patient’s bedside. These opportunities, and the ongoing pandemic events, have diminished the potentially unfavorable connotations of tribalism and, in exchange, galvanized the spirit of teamwork and collaboration in health care.


When our colleagues in surgery and medicine were experiencing significant reductions in clinic visits and procedures, IR practices were largely busy with essential procedures and patient care, involving patients with cancer, trauma, infection, dialysis and other urgent needs for IR services. Our practice was only down 20% and many other practices around the country were seeing similar minimal reductions. This phenomenon strongly supports what we as IRs have known for a long time—how essential we are to the timely and effective care


of our patients. Historically, there has been a notion that patients, and even some non-IR physicians, are unaware of the complete breadth of IR services, consequently stunting referrals. When patients are turned away from other specialists, and IRs can take on services traditionally offered by those providers (e.g., UFE), IRs may be inadvertently making their presence known to patients and referring departments alike. Not only do we have an opportunity to promote and market our services to referring departments, but we are demonstrating our value as clinical specialists in hopes of future collaboration and consultation.


Hopefully, IR response during this pandemic will result in other medical specialties understanding just how much IRs can be the conduit to true multidisciplinary care and how we should be respected as colleagues and clinicians. The pandemic offers an opportunity for IRs to increase our voice regarding clinical decisions. New policies such as those concerning COVID-positive patients have granted interventionalists the right of refusal for those cases that do not require imaging guidance or technical skills. Exercising this right of refusal is a relatively novel concept in our (classically) referral- dependent specialty, thus instilling a sense of appreciation in referring providers for when we accept such cases in the future. Ultimately, this all results in enhancing teamwork between IR and other departments. As IR continues to transition to a more clinically oriented specialty, we continue to find creative ways to demonstrate our value in a team-based setting to strengthen the hospital’s sense of an IR-based multidisciplinary tribe.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40