This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
LEGAL COMMENTS


Geriatric Dental Patients with Diminished Decision-Making Capacity Issues Surrounding Informed Consent


Scenario: You have a long-standing relationship with an elderly patient, Maxine, who comes in for her regularly scheduled teeth cleaning. Recently, Maxine’s son has been accompanying her to dental appointments. You notice Maxine is acting con- fused and does not seem to recognize you, and you are concerned that Maxine’s cognitive impairment has reached a prob- lematic level. Can Maxine provide appropriate consent to treatment? How should you make this important determination? Can Maxine’s son provide consent on her behalf?


F


or dental professionals, it is not uncommon to confront and treat ge- riatric patients who have some level of apparent cognitive impairment.¹


Dentists must assess whether any such patient with diminished decision-making capacity due to cognitive impairment still possesses the capacity to provide “informed consent.”² To further complicate this assess- ment, the capacity of a patient to provide informed consent can change from one interaction to the next. Regardless, when a dentist suspects that a patient does not have the capacity to provide informed consent, the dentist should stop providing treatment until appropriate consent has been obtained.


This article discusses some of the legal questions that a dentist faces when mak- ing an evaluation about the ability of his or her patients to provide informed consent and other issues related to the treatment of patients with diminished capacity under Missouri law.


INFORMED CONSENT


Dentists must obtain informed consent be- fore treating a patient. In order for a dentist to obtain informed consent from a patient in Missouri: • the patient must have the capacity to reason and make judgments;


• the decision must be made voluntarily and without coercion; and,


• the patient must have a clear under- 28 focus | NOV/DEC 2016 | ISSUE 6


standing of the risks and benefits of the proposed treatment, along with a full understanding of the nature of the disease and the prognosis.³


Dentists have an obligation to communi- cate to the patient and ensure the patient understands (1) the diagnosis of his or her condition, (2) the dentist’s recommended treatment and alternative treatments, (3) the potential risks associated with all treatment plans, and (4) the potential risks of not re- ceiving treatment.⁴ Dentists must go through the process of obtaining informed consent each time services are provided to a patient,


and it is advisable to document the patient’s consent in his or her medical record.


Based on the requirements of informed consent, if the patient lacks the capacity to reason and make judgments, he or she can- not provide informed consent to treatment. Dentists should evaluate whether a patient has the ability to provide appropriate in- formed consent and should be cognizant that patients with cognitive impairment may slip into and out of incapacitation. If it appears that a patient may not have the capacity to provide informed consent, the dentist should stop providing dental services to the patient until appropriate consent is obtained.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56