search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Erskine College


‘The facts support the faith’: Dr. Stephen Meyer speaks at Erskine’s Garnet & Gold Forum


Dr. Stephen C. Meyer, director of the Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Cul-


ture in Seattle, Washington, delivered the keynote address at Erskine’s Second Annual Gar- net & Gold Forum on Sept. 29 in the recently renovated Bowie Arts Center on the Erskine College campus.


“The fundamental question that runs underneath many of the issues dividing our cul-


ture is actually the God question—is God real or imaginary?” Meyer told his audience. Citing “an almost epidemic loss of belief in God,” a drop of about 10 percent over 10 years according to a recent Gallup poll, Meyer noted that the downward trend is especially strong among young people. Seeking the root causes of this shift, Meyer’s organization commissioned a public opin- ion survey which found that 65 percent of self-described atheists and 43 percent of agnos-  make the existence of God less probable,” Meyer said. Meyer traces this belief about science to the materialistic worldview prevalent among scientists and members of the “knowledge culture”—a worldview in which no creator is responsible for the existence of the universe. Richard Dawkins, one famous proponent of this view said, “The universe we observe


has precisely the properties we should expect if there is at bottom no design, no purpose, nothing but blind pitiless indifference.” Meyer pointed out that, according to Dawkins himself, our knowledge of the world is testable by observation, which makes Dawkins’ claims—and the claims of materialism—        spoke about scientists whose views were challenged by such discoveries.  powerful telescopes offered evidence not only that galaxies beyond our Milky Way exist, but that those galaxies are moving away from us in real time, their light “stretched,” sug- gesting an expanding universe. This, in turn, suggests that the universe had a beginning from which it expanded.  a “Goldilocks universe.” Many natural phenomena—the strength of gravity and electro- magnetism as well as the speed of light, for instance—must fall within tight parameters for life to exist. Third, Meyer pointed to discoveries about DNA, digital code that directs the composi- tion of cells. He compared this code to that developed by programmers at an airplane fac- tory, information which directs the building of the airplanes. “Information in our experience always arises from an intelligent source,” Meyer said. “So the discovery of information at the foundation of life…suggests—implies—the activity of a designing mind.”


Meyer named a number of scientists who changed their minds as a direct result of these  universe, which he had rejected earlier in his career because of the theory’s theistic impli- cations. Atheist astronomer Allan Sandage became a Christian, inspired by—not in spite of—science. Sir Fred Hoyle, also an astronomer, was staunchly anti-religious but eventually conceded that a “super-intellect” must have been involved in the origin of the universe. “The facts support the faith,” Meyer said. “They don’t contradict the faith.” Meyer took several questions from the audience, and Erskine President Dr. Steve Adam-  “Erskine College started this forum to accomplish what you heard tonight—providing thought-provoking conversations on every aspect of Christianity,” Adamson said. He noted - 


Meyer spent two days leading up to the Garnet & Gold Forum on the Erskine campus. During that time, he spoke at a planned Fleet Fellowship gathering. Re- sponse from students was so positive that he decided to add another event to his Erskine schedule—a “Town Hall” event in  of the campus community. A former geophysicist and college pro-


fessor, Meyer is the author of theNew York Times bestseller Darwin’s Doubt: The Explo- sive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for In- telligent Design (2013) as well as Signature of the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design (2009), named one of the top books of the year by the Times Literary Supplement. His latest work is The Return of the God Hypothesis (2021). Meyer, who earned a Ph.D. in the phi- losophy of science at the University of Cam- bridge, has contributed to academic publi- cations, published editorials in prominent newspapers, appeared on national televi- sion and radio programs, and been featured in two New York Times front-page stories.


W. David Conner, former Erskine trustee, shakes hands with Dr. Stephen Meyer.


From left, Alan Broyles, Lisa Whitehurst, Erskine Board of Trustees Chairman Mike Whitehurst


12


The Associate Reformed Presbyterian


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32