YOUR BEST PRACTICE
How well do you know your soil?
Identifying soil water characteristics for
crucial to managing the water supply.
BY DAVE GOORAHOO, PHD
Fresno State Soils Judging Club student Jagdeep Basi learns about identifying a soil’s textural and structural properties.
M
any factors impact your ability to irrigate effectively — from equipment to water supply to scheduling method. But one of the most fundamental requirements to
efficient and effective irrigation is to know the texture and structure of soils in your field.
Water infiltration into the soil profile and flow within it, be it for agricultural purposes such as plant uptake or for environmental concerns such as nitrate leaching, is dependent on the soil water content and the energy status or tension at which the water molecules are held by the soil. The quantity of water within soil pores is referred to as the soil water content and can be expressed on mass or gravimetric basis, volumetric basis or depth equivalent (water depth) basis. The energy level or matric potential within the unsaturated zone of the soil, which is the region that is most
θ
Figure 1: This soil water retention curve shows the major components that affect plant water uptake. AW = available water, FC = field capacity and WP = wilting point
26 Irrigation TODAY | Winter 2020
relevant to plant roots, is primarily attributed to the attraction of water molecules to the solid soil matrix.
Soil water characteristics
A soil water retention curve is the relationship between the water content and the soil matric potential (see fig. 1). This curve is unique for different types of soil, and it can be used to deter- mine the soil-water related properties such as the water content at saturation, field capacity and wilting point when the soil matric potential values are at zero, –1/3 bar and –15 bars, respectively.
Free water moves spontaneously into dry soil and, in so doing, the water loses energy. By convention, the standard state of free water
10,000
1,000
100 Sand 10 Clay Loam 1 Medium Clay Peat
0.1 0 0.2 0.4 θ (m3 m–3 0.6 )
Figure 2: Soil water retention curves for various soil types
irrigationtoday.org 0.8 1
Ψ Ψ θ θ θ
|| (kPa)
Photo credit: Dave Goorahoo
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40