2 years old he’s fully caught up with his peers after that initial setback. He currently has no neurological abnormalities, intellectual disability or signs of heart failure.


IRQ: What makes this case stand out to you? AC: This case is special to me because, as a trainee, you want to be aggressive and take care of everything. You want a perfect angiographic outcome. But this case was a learning opportunity because my attending told me that in these patients, you don’t always want to get a perfect picture. In this particular case, even more than others, perfect can be the enemy of good.


We intervened and achieved maybe 40–50% reduction in flow by coiling off that one large feeder from the right side. When we attempted to go into the smaller feeders, there was some difficulty and we were concerned that we may cause more harm than good, so we chose to wait and watch from there. Being a trainee who is learning mostly the “how” and “when” of procedures, this part of “when not to proceed” was an important lesson for me.


We continued clinical and spaced imaging surveillance and eventually brought the patient back when he was a year old and his head was large enough for us to go into those other vessels. Moreover, his shunt was also growing a little bit with his age. We went in and took care of the majority of those additional feeders. After reducing the flow substantially, we discussed the patient with his parents, who desired a definitive procedure, prompting us to adopt an additional transvenous approach in the same session to block off a large venous sac before drainage into the vein of Galen.


IRQ: How is the patient now? AC: He’s doing fantastic. We recently had another follow-up and at almost


This was a very involved clinical case requiring a lot of judgment. The patient’s care was a very thoughtful, deliberate process throughout and it never focused on “doing whatever it takes to get the best outcome.” For someone in training, it was very eye-opening. They say that you learn how to operate in the first 10 years, learn when to operate in the next 10 years, and learn when not to operate in the last 10 years of practice. If I were approaching this case alone, I would have wanted to do everything in the first go. But my attending, Arindam Rano Chatterjee, MD, who was so experienced and deliberate in his approach, showed me the value of taking small steps and waiting to get an ideal outcome in good time.


In addition, this case really drove home how important it is to have a fundamental understanding of anatomy and radiology as well as procedural skills. In this case, the patient did not have a standard VGAM despite looking like one, and if we had treated it as such, we wouldn’t have had as good of an outcome. In my Virtual Angio club presentation, I talked about how we were able to embolize a separate venous pouch using the transvenous route. Since we are IRs, I really feel that it’s important to understand the imaging before we start doing intervention, and this case emphasized that viewpoint. I like to think of myself as a physician first, radiologist second and interventionist last as I progress through my training.


Don’t miss the January pediatric Virtual Angio Club!


The January Virtual Angio Club coordinators, Shellie Josephs, MD, FSIR; Hasmukh J. Prajapati, MD, FSIR; Deborah Rabinowitz, MD; and Rakesh Ahuja, MD, invite you to join the upcoming SIR Virtual Angio Club,


hosted by the SIR Pediatric CSC. Register to attend the webinar on Jan. 24.


Don’t miss the January pediatrics


VAC! Register via the QR code above.


IRQ: How does the pediatric aspect stand out to you? AC: I love pediatric interventions because we can add so many fruitful years after intervention. For so many patients, we can provide pain palliation and improve someone’s quality of life for the last 3 months or so of their life—but for pediatric patients, you can add 50, 80, 100 years to their life. And kids are so good at springing back, and they do so well clinically. It’s hard not to get excited when you see them flourishing at follow-up. A lot of our interventions are not curative, but with pediatrics, they really can be.


irq.sirweb.org | 25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40