(Figure 1) and compared battery life, image resolution, and processing time from different software. Jing then further analyzed the images using geospatial software and experimented with various ways to characterize certain problems in the field based on the drone images. Tese included assessing flood damage, field uniformity, and shade pressure.
One case study originating from these collaborations was the assessment of flood damage in one of Super- Sod’s North Carolina tall fescue production fields. Te overall farm was about 230 acres and the total area that was impacted by the standing water was quantified (~72 acres) based on the drone images taken several weeks after flooding (Figure 2). Te impacted area was very hard to
Figure 3.
measure from the ground because of its irregular shape, but damage assessment was needed to determine crop loss for insurance purposes. It is worth mentioning that in this case the areas of interests were visually confirmed by the grower and the precise estimate of economic loss was used in the decision to abandon this field.
Similarly, drones can be used to monitor establishment following sprigging, regrowth following harvest, and to assess the efficacy of herbicide applications. Beyond the regular digital images, multispectral sensors provide a more robust understanding of plant health. During 2018, the most commonly used vegetation index, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), was used to estimate the uniformity and productivity in a seeded centipedegrass field at Patten Seed (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Production field of seeded centipedegrass. Left: digital RGB image; Right: NDVI image.
44
TPI Turf News March/April 2019
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68