search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Greater statistical significance was noted, among


all ET levels at Logan, UT, however no Kentucky bluegrass performed at the acceptable lawn quality level for the season average, many falling below even the minimally acceptable quality score for low maintenance (5.0). Overall, tall fescues performed better with Tunderstruck, DLFPS-321/3679, LTP-SYN-A3 and RS4 in the top turf quality statistical group under the 40 percent ETo replacement (turf quality scores of 5.7, 5.5, 5.3 and 5.2 respectively). Less, but still some statistical significance was noted at the 60 percent ETo regime with no statistical differences seen in tall fescue mean turf quality scores at 80 percent ETo. In the first Fort Collins, CO, data, an interesting


and different effect from the ET regimes was noticed. Te perennial ryegrass control entry that is included in the trial was one of the lowest, or the lowest performing entry at each site, with the exception being Fort Collins. Under every ETo regime at Fort Collins, both for Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue, the perennial ryegrass control entry was the top entry, in some cases statistically better than all entries. At the least, the perennial ryegrass entry was statistically better than most tall fescue and bluegrass entries. Besides the perennial ryegrass performance,


PST-K13-141 and PST-K11-118 Kentucky bluegrasses were consistently good at all three ETo levels. For tall fescue, PST-5SDS was the top entry under 40 percent ETo, while Catalyst, DLFPS-321/3678 and PST-R511 were also among the best performing entries under the three irrigation regimes. Te fifth reduced irrigation site, St. Paul, MN,


being much farther north than other sites, utilized a modified ETo schedule of 0, 25 and 75 percent replacement. Moderate statistical significance was noted under the three irrigation regimes, with tall fescue scoring higher overall than Kentucky bluegrass. Under the 0 percent and 25 percent regimes, no bluegrass entry finished with an acceptable lawn turf quality rating (6.0). Consistently rating near the top under all three levels include bluegrasses Blue Note, Blue Devil and PST-K3-141. Conversely, almost every tall fescue entry finished with an acceptable turf quality rating under all regimes at St. Paul. Some of the best tall fescues under each ET level include Nonet, DLFPS-321/3678 and PST-5SDS.


Other Species Other cool-season species, such as prairie


junegrass (Koeleria spp.), tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia cespitosa), rough bluegrass (Poa trivialis), supina bluegrass (Poa supina) and annual bluegrass (Poa annua) are potential sod products, although limited in their utility and geographical area of adaptation. Native species, such as junegrass and tufted


hairgrass, under low maintenance, can form a dense sward with an appearance somewhat like perennial ryegrass or


58


Kentucky bluegrass. One tufted hairgrass cultivar has been tested by NTEP (1998 NTEP Fineleaf Fescue trial). Te other bluegrass species, rough, annual and supina, are still very much under development without a lot known about their performance characteristics and production needs. Other native species, such as inland saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) and poverty grass (Danthonia spicata), have special traits such as salt tolerance (inland saltgrass) or tolerance to infertile soils (poverty grass), but are probably several years away from commercialization.


WARM-SEASON In spring/summer 2013, new trials of


bermudagrass and zoysiagrass were established, with 35 entries in each trial. In addition, a unique new trial was established in conjunction with the United States Golf Association (USGA). Te trial evaluates bermudagrass (15 entries), zoysiagrass (11 entries) and seashore paspalum (2 entries) at eleven locations under putting green conditions. Te final summary of data from each of these


three warm-season trials is now available from NTEP. Even though each trial features a different set of data, a common theme of all these trials is data on initial establishment from 2013. However, due to the unusually harsh winter that many locations experienced in 2013/2014, several entries were never able to establish at some locations. Data on winter injury was collected and the cooperators were consulted on the condition of their trials. Since 2013-14 was the worst winter in more than thirty years, the decision was made by NTEP to replant several or all entries at the worst winter injury sites. NTEP has never replanted so many entries and locations in our history, but we felt it was necessary to give all entries an equal opportunity to establish and perform. No more replanting will take place for these three trials. Te information on the entries replanted at each location is noted on the data tables.


Bermudagrass Te 2013 bermuda NTEP trial contains eighteen


(18) seeded entries and seventeen (17) vegetative entries. Many of these entries are experimental cultivars or new commercial cultivars. NTEP evaluates warm-season grasses by comparing seeded and vegetative entries, and also by separately comparing seeded vs. seeded and vegetative vs. vegetative. Te final year of this trial was 2017. Terefore, we


now have several years of data that show the potential of new experimental entries. A final summary of data from 2013-2017 is available on the NTEP website. A new trial is being established in 2019, but for now, we will utilize data from the 2013 trial to discuss bermudagrass cultivar improvements.


TPI Turf News July/August 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92