search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MSMA UPDATE FOR TURFGRASS SOD PRODUCTION


By Casey Reynolds, PhD


MSMA is a broad-spectrum organic arsenical herbicide that has been registered for use in the United States since 1964. (MSMA is an acronym for MonoSodium Methane Arsonate.) MSMA has been used for many years in commercial and residential lawn care; parks and athletic fields; golf courses; bluegrass, fescue and ryegrass grown for seed; as well as cotton; non-bearing fruit and nuts; citrus, bearing and non-bearing; forestry; drainage ditch banks; railroad, pipeline and utility rights-of-way; fence rows; storage yards; and similar non-crop areas. MSMA is a Group 17 post-emergent herbicide that is labeled for control of many annual and perennial weed species such as crabgrass, dallisgrass, foxtails, johnsongrass, goosegrass, nutsedge, and others. It has been sold under many different trade names and until 2009 was labeled for all the above-mentioned uses.


In 1983, the registrants of MSMA formed the Methane Arsonic Acid Research Task Force (Task Force) to conduct scientific studies in response to requests for information from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Despite the fact that those studies indicated no concern for risk to human health or the environment from MSMA use, in 2006, the EPA proposed the cancellation of all the uses of MSMA. Te proposed ban was based on their concern that the use of MSMA may result in an increase of inorganic arsenic in soil.


Te EPA first announced its decision to terminate uses of organic arsenicals on July 8, 2006. In 2009, after three years of negotiations, the Task Force reached an agreement with EPA for the continued registration of several uses of MSMA and the cancellation of the other organic arsenical products. Te agreement retained the permanent registration for MSMA use on cotton. Tree turfgrass uses were conditionally registered—turfgrass production, golf courses, and highway rights-of-way (ROW). All other uses were canceled. Florida also was deleted from the label for turfgrass uses.


Te condition of the registration for the turfgrass uses was the submission of additional scientific data by the Task Force demonstrating the safety of the product, as well as no concern from inorganic arsenic resulting from the use of MSMA. Te 2009 agreement also stipulated that EPA would conduct a review of the submitted scientific data. Note: In 2009, the Task Force changed its name to the Organic Arsenical Products Task Force (OAPTF).


14


Te required information was submitted to EPA in 2012. However, ten years after the agreement was signed, EPA has not completed the agreed upon review of the accumulating scientific data that would enable a realistic assessment of whether there is a potential risk to human health or the environment from the use of MSMA.


Te lack of broad spectrum, economically acceptable, alternative products, combined with the emergence of several new problem-weed species and an increase in resistance of weeds to other herbicides, makes a broader availability of MSMA of increasing importance.


In response to those needs and requests from users, the Task Force is planning to submit an application to the EPA in the coming months under the Pesticide Registration Improvement Act (PRIA). Tis application would seek to make the current turfgrass production uses of MSMA permanent, to restore uses canceled in 2009 (e.g., athletic fields, parks, lawn care by licensed applicators), and to amend the application restrictions for some of the current uses. In response to requests from users, the Task Force will potentially seek to add Florida back to the label for golf courses and turfgrass production. Te PRIA application is also intended to prompt EPA to conduct the risk assessment of MSMA called for in the 2009 agreement.


An important element in making the case to EPA will be continued support from users to demonstrate the critical need for MSMA. TPI is working with the Task Force (OAPTF) to construct comments for submission. TPI also met with the EPA in Washington, D.C., on May 16, 2019, to discuss with them how important this product is in turfgrass sod production. Our speaking points during that meeting included the following:


TPI Turf News July/August 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92