Often times, it is not possible to identify all potential (in some cases perceived) deficiencies without input from unit owners. As such, the preparation and review of unit owner surveys can be a valuable part of developing a transition study. Persistent reports of issues by unit owners may indicate significant underlying problems. Experienced engineers use such surveys to determine what building systems or components should be subjected to additional scrutiny.

Given the complexity of today’s building systems, no single consultant is an expert in all these components and systems. In some cases, the prime consultant may recommend involving sub-consultants to assist with an evaluation of some systems. For example, building professionals typically retain mechanical, electrical, plumbing (MEP) and elevator specialists to assist in the evaluation of such building systems.

Transition studies are valuable tools regardless of whether significant defects or deficiencies are suspected. In the case of deficiencies, a transition study can serve as the

basis to compel the developer to remedy those deficiencies that, if not detected, would become the responsibility of the community association assuming ownership.

It is important to understand that transition studies are not intended to serve as punch list inspections. They are only intended to reveal major code violations or deficiencies. As such, certain minor issues such as missing electrical junction box covers, or small openings in exterior sealant joints will likely not be detected through a transition study.

Additionally, the value of the transition studies is directly proportional to the extent of effort invested and the qualifications of the firms performing them. The results and value of the transition studies can therefore vary greatly depending on the fees and qualifications of the firms performing them.

20 | COMMON INTEREST®

A Publication of CAI-Illinois Chapter