search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
“The [mushroom ID apps] all had 4-star reviews or more.


Such evaluations are nonsense, since the ratings are done by people even less


knowledgeable than I am!”


Mushroom identification apps for your smartphone - a critical appraisal


The Cowtown Curmudgeon Denis R. Benjamin


D


espite being intimate with fungi for nigh on 50 years, I am a notoriously poor


taxonomist. Like many I was initially seduced by food, but then matured into toxicology, ecology and basic biology. My initial classification for fungi was based on the simple Russian system: “edible, poisonous, we don’t care.” Later in life, when art became a passion, I added a fourth category: “worth painting.” Living in the Pacific Northwest I became familiar with about 120 of the common mushrooms and adept identifying the toxic few. As a pathologist, pattern recognition was the stock-in-trade, but I limited myself to


human disease, rather than consuming limited neuronal storage space with fungi. I am embarrassed about not being au courant with the thousands of different fungal species or their most current monikers, so I rely on others for assistance. Ten, I thought, why not try one of the new smartphone apps? Being an early adopter of computers


I attempted writing a mushroom identification program while cutting my eyeteeth on Apple Basic in the 1970s. I discovered that dichotomous keys do not work as well for mushrooms as they do for plants, so gave up in disgust. Finally, synoptic keys became available, which are considerably better. One merely had to enter as many details of a mushroom as possible and the key would propose possible matches which


one could research further. One of the best of these (MycoMatch) was written for the Pacific Northwest by Alan Gibson. An offshoot of this are the keys and pictorial keys managed by Danny Miller. As good as these are, few of us carry computers into the woods, so they are limited to when we return home, tired and wet, with baskets of edibles begging to be processed. Moreover, the initial versions were unable to keep up with technology changes, limiting widespread adoption. Along came smartphones, soon


accompanied by a panoply of identification apps — plants, birds, insects, rocks, bugs, wine and mushrooms. Te granddaddy of all, adopted by every prospective biologist, is iNaturalist. My phone is dotted with


Winter 2022 FUNGI Volume 15:1 5


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60