YOUR BEST PRACTICE
or continuously at 1 to 2 ppm. The latter is often achieved using a special tool to sprinkle about 1 ounce of granular WSPAM at the furrow head near the inflowing water. These approaches are effective for reducing erosion and increasing infiltration over a broad range of conditions; however, a few factors need to be considered to achieve maximum efficacy of the WSPAM treatment:
• irrigation water quality – If irrigation water has an unusually low salt concentration such as from an irrigation source that receives a large influx of snowmelt waters, is high in sodium or contains high sediment loads, the application may need to be adjusted to be most effective.
• soil properties – Shortly after irrigation begins, infiltration in furrow soils quickly declines due to the breakdown of soil structure and formation of a slowly permeable surface seal. WSPAM increases infiltration in the furrow by stabilizing soils in the channel and delaying or preventing seal development. Therefore, WSPAM may not improve water intake for soils where infiltration already is inhibited by a restrictive subsoil horizon. Similarly, in furrow soils that lack structure entirely, such as in sands, WSPAM applied to water at >2 ppm may reduce infiltration due to viscous effects. This is beneficial since it can increase irrigation uniformity in such soils. Recent research indicates that relative decreases in initial soil water content and increases in water temperature or salt content can increase infiltration benefits derived from WSPAM treatments.
In general, WSPAM has been shown to effectively control furrow erosion for most soils and irrigation waters present in semiarid farmlands. The polymer achieves its greatest reductions in runoff sediment losses in those soils that are most susceptible to erosion. In the few studies that have evaluated WSPAM in regions with wetter climates (i.e., having generally acidic soils and irrigation water), results have been mixed. Soils high in shrinking- swelling clays and organic matter may require greater WSPAM application rates, although research on such soils is also limited.
irrigationtoday.org
Increasing soil water retention with XPAM
Cross-linked polymers, including XPAM, have been employed in the horticulture and nursery industries for at least 25 years to increase water retention in potting mixes that are engineered for thorough drainage. XPAM could be a useful amendment for arable lands, where soil productivity potential is generally declining while food demand is rising. A cost- effective means of increasing plant available water would be of great benefit to remediate degraded soils, buffer effects of drought and climate change on rainfall and irrigation water supplies, and bring soils with marginal water potential into production. Though much research has shown that XPAM additions reduce crop stress and increase yields under drought, little XPAM is used at the farm level because initial costs are high and the durability of XPAM properties in soil is poorly understood. Recent research has shown that the mean residence time of XPAM water- retention benefits in a degraded soil was far longer (at least 24 years) than previously estimated (3-5 years), substantially increasing the cost-effectiveness of the practice. Conversely, water retention benefits of the cross-linked polyacrylic acid polymer tested persisted for only one growing season.
The use of XPAM in humid regions may present a challenge, since increased soil water retention during periods of surplus precipitation could create problems associated with excess water: slow soil drying/warming in spring and delayed tillage and planting. XPAM additions to irrigated soils in semiarid lands may provide the most benefits because water deliveries to fields in these areas are intensively managed and can be limited or delayed. However, in such areas, the soil profile still needs to be flushed periodically using an adequate leaching fraction to avoid salt accumulation. The amount of water absorbed by XPAM declines with increasing salt content in soil or irrigation water, though this is partially influenced by the type of cations present.
Rodrick (Rick) D. Lentz, PhD, is a research soil
Winter 2021 | Irrigation TODAY 27
THOUGH MUCH RESEARCH HAS SHOWN THAT XPAM ADDITIONS REDUCE CROP STRESS AND INCREASE YIELDS UNDER DROUGHT, LITTLE XPAM IS USED AT THE FARM LEVEL.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40
