search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Geosciences in Modern Society


James F. Howard, Ph.D., CPG-2536 Status of the Profession


The geosciences have, for the past several decades, under- gone a significant decline in both numbers and in perceived value to modern society. The traditional areas of petroleum exploration and resource mining have been the target of numerous organizations who view those activities as basically destructive elements that potentially threaten the future of the earth itself.


In the wake of the storm of negativity characterizing our profession, a steady decline in both practicing geoscientists and geoscience students has been in evidence, to the point where many departments have been forced to either join with other, more glamorous disciplines or suffer complete dissolution.


Why has our profession been relegated to what is to many a second-rate desirability as a goal for future students? What caused this decline in future prospects for the geoscience profession?


Most of the resources of the societies involved in promot- ing the geosciences have concentrated their efforts into two major areas:


Providing teachers with better materials to support their efforts to educate their students;


Targeting the existing practitioners to enhance their skill set and more effectively accomplish their objectives, e.g. pro- duce more oil, minerals resources and, relatively recently, aid in solving environmental problems, usually under the supervision of an engineer.


The graphs from AIPG and AGI shown in Figure 1 below and Figure 2 on page 40 illustrate the trends of AIPG member- ship and Geoscience student enrollment over the past decades.


Why the decline in perceived value of the Geosciences?


Reasons for this decline in active AIPG membership and in potential future additions to the geoscience work force are numerous, some external and some self-inflicted.


Figure 1 - AIPG Enrollment Trends from 1988 to 2020. www.aipg.org Apr.May.Jun 2021 • TPG 39


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64