search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Feature


Opportunities and challenges in pediatrics


An interview with Richard B. Towbin, MD, FSIR, and James S. Donaldson, MD


“The only constant in life is change.” —HERACLITUS By Lisa Kang, MD


The field of pediatric interventional radiology has evolved and expanded immensely over just a few decades and continues to do so at an ever-increasing pace. Richard B. Towbin, MD, FSIR, a 2021 SIR Gold Medalist and former director of pediatric radiology at Phoenix Children’s Hospital, and James S. Donaldson, MD, professor of radiology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, have observed and been key participants in this evolution.


In this interview, Drs. Towbin and Donaldson spoke with IRQ on how pediatric IR has come into its own as a subspecialty, the role of pediatric IRs in multidisciplinary care and how to approach training the next generation.


22 IRQ | SUMMER 2021


Lisa Kang, MD: You were both involved in the early days of pediatric IR. How has the field evolved? Richard B. Towbin, MD, FSIR: I started in pediatric radiology in the 1970s after finishing my training as a pediatrician. On the adult patient side, interventional radiology was already taking hold, but not in pediatrics. We began trying to improve on the interventional procedures the adult side was pioneering and were focused on designing equipment specifically for younger patients. There was nothing designed that would work in children at the time, so we were innovating with sedation and catheters. We had some new inventions, but


mostly we adapted existing tools, watched the adult IRs and tried to do the procedures in kids. The first therapies we did were aspiration, drainage and biopsies. Everything morphed when good CT and MR came out, because the imaging was fast and we were then able to guide procedures using imaging. Once we could better


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40